盧博斯·莫特爾

盧博斯·莫特爾捷克語Luboš Motl捷克語發音:[ˈluboʃ ˈmotl̩],1973年12月5日)是捷克物理學家博主。2004年至2007年,在哈佛大學擔任物理學助理教授。科學出版物專注於弦理論

Luboš Motl
Luboš Motl
出生 (1973-12-05) 1973年12月5日51歲)
 捷克斯洛伐克(現 捷克比爾森
母校查理大學(MA)
羅格斯大學(PhD)
知名于
科学生涯
研究领域理論物理學弦理論
论文Nonperturbative Formulations of Superstring Theory(超弦理論的非微擾公式)(2001)
博士導師托馬斯·湯姆·班克斯

生活和事業

出生於今捷克共和國比爾森。他在1992年國際數學奧林匹克競賽曾獲銅牌。[1]布拉格查理大學碩士學位,在羅格斯大學哲學博士學位(2001年),任哈佛大學初級研究員(2001-2004年)和助理教授(2004-2007年)。2007年離開哈佛回到捷克。

已隱藏部分未翻譯内容,歡迎參與翻譯

Although an undergraduate at a Czech university where none of the faculty specialized in string theory, Motl came to the attention of string theorist Thomas Banks in 1996, when Banks read an arXiv posting by Motl on matrix string theory. "I was at first a little annoyed by [Motl's] paper, because it scooped me," said Banks. "This feeling turned to awe when I realized that Lubos was still an undergraduate".[2] He then became a graduate student of Banks, and wrote his PhD thesis on matrix theory. While at Harvard, Motl worked on the pp-wave limit of AdS/CFT correspondence,[需要解释] twistor theory and its application to gauge theory with supersymmetry, black hole thermodynamics and the conjectured relevance of quasinormal modes for loop quantum gravity, deconstruction, and other topics. In 2006, he proposed the weak gravity conjecture with Nima Arkani-Hamed, Alberto Nicolis and Cumrun Vafa.[3]

He is the author of L'équation Bogdanov, a 2008 French-language book discussing the scientific ideas and controversy of the Bogdanov brothers.[4]

The Reference Frame

Motl writes a science and politics blog called "The Reference Frame: Supersymmetric world from a conservative viewpoint", in which he expresses his scientific and right-wing political opinions, including invective as well as personal insults.[5] The blog has been described by George Musser as an "over-the-top" defense of string theory, defining one of the extremes of scientific opinions on that topic, with the other extreme being represented by Peter Woit.[6] Following the example of Oriana Fallaci, Motl characterizes himself as a Christian atheist.[7][8] He also describes himself as a "champion of the consistent histories interpretation of quantum mechanics",[9] and has strongly criticised Erik Verlinde's entropic gravity theory.[10][11] As of April 2022, Motl abolished the blog citing censorship pressures and general dissatisfaction.[12][13]

參考文獻

  1. ^ International Mathematical Olympiad. International Mathematical Olympiad. [2017-10-11]. (原始内容存档于2022-08-11). 
  2. ^ "The World of Science Becomes a Global Village; Archive Opens a New Realm of Research"页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆), James Glanz, New York Times, May 1, 2001
  3. ^ Nima Arkani-Hamed, Lubos Motl, Alberto Nicolis, Cumrun Vafa, The String Landscape, Black Holes and Gravity as the Weakest Force, JHEP 0706:060,2007, arXiv:hep-th/0601001.
  4. ^ Motl, Luboš. L'équation Bogdanov: le secret de l'origine de l'univers?. Presses de la Renaissance. 2008. ISBN 978-2750903862. 
  5. ^ German Physicist Fights Back Against Sexist Blogger After 12 Years of Relentless Online Abuse. HollywoodLAnews. 2019-03-16 [2021-08-21]. (原始内容存档于2022-01-07). 
  6. ^ Musser, George. The Complete Idiot's Guide to String Theory - George Musser. 2008: 279 [2015-08-25]. ISBN 9781592577026. (原始内容存档于2022-05-12). 
  7. ^ Are all climate skeptics theocratic?. The Reference Frame. 2011-09-09 [2015-08-25]. (原始内容存档于2021-10-18). 
  8. ^ The Reference Frame: Oriana Fallaci: The Force of Reason. Motls.blogspot.com. 2006-09-27 [2015-08-25]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-03). 
  9. ^ Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. The Reference Frame. 2011-05-29 [2019-06-17]. (原始内容存档于2021-09-25). 
  10. ^ First test of rival to Einstein's gravity kills off dark matter. New Scientist. 2016-12-15 [2017-08-01]. (原始内容存档于2022-01-05). 
  11. ^ Verlinde's de Sitter MOND is highly incomplete, to say the least. The Reference Frame (Blog). 2016-11-12 [2017-08-01]. (原始内容存档于2022-01-05). 
  12. ^ Is The CDF W Mass Measurement A Nail In The SM Coffin?. science20.com. [2022-04-27]. (原始内容存档于2022-05-04). 
  13. ^ The Reference Frame: AdSense became unusable. disqus.com. [2022-04-27]. (原始内容存档于2022-08-17). 

外部鏈接