討論:邁克 (作家)

了解關於此頁面的更多內容

本條目必須遵守維基百科生者傳記方針。缺乏來源或來源不可靠的負面內容必須立即移除，尤其是可能造成當事人名譽損害的內容。在移除這些資料時不受到回退不過三原則的規範。
如果您是本條目的主角，請參見關於您本人的條目及自傳。如發現條目主角編輯條目時，請參見處理條目主角所作的編輯。

本條目與高風險主題在世人物傳記相關，故適用高風險主題流程及相關規範。持續或嚴重牴觸維基百科五大支柱或方針指引的編者可被管理員封鎖或實施編輯限制。用戶在編輯本頁面前應先參閱高風險主題相關規範。

本條目頁依照頁面評級標準評為初級。
本條目頁屬於下列維基專題範疇：

傳記專題

（獲評初級、未知重要度）

	人物主題閱論編這個條目屬於傳記專題的一部分，用於整理和撰寫維基百科中的人物條目。歡迎任何感興趣的參與者加入這個專題並參與討論。
初	根據專題品質評級標準，本條目頁已評為初級。
未知	根據專題重要度評級標準，本條目尚未接受評級。

LGBT專題

（獲評初級、中重要度）

	LGBT主題閱論編本條目屬於LGBT專題 ^(對話) 的範疇，一個旨在改善中文維基百科內所有LGBT相關內容的項目。欲查更多資訊、或有意參與，請瀏覽專題主頁，參與其討論並完成相應的開放性任務。
初	根據專題品質評級標準，本條目頁已評為初級。
中	根據專題重要度評級標準，本條目已評為中重要度。

來源請求

最新留言：15 年前1則留言1個人參與討論

IP用戶61.226.137.56指出林邁克先生並未「自幼移居香港」，請了解該作家的維基人鑑別一下。—Leon3289 (留言) 2009年7月5日 (日) 11:34 (UTC)回覆

本人是本條目的始作者，關於邁克「自幼移居香港」一句，實在於發表後得邁克本人肯定，下為電郵紀錄。

另外，邁克不少專欄中提及過兒時與母親來港後生活，不辯自証。

＝＝＝

Dear Janet,

Yes The Camp was my own publishing house, and yes, I think the dates are correct. Thanks again for your kindness.

ML

> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:00:13 +0800 > Subject: Re: 我看見的你 (在維基) > > you're welcome. I just want to do things for people I like before it's > too late. Just out of little courtesy. > > thanks for your kind reminder. just one more point, is that "大本營" your > publishing house? > > Hope that the booklist also correct (cause I just base on the > publishing date for 1st edition release in Hong Kong). > > please advise and cheers, > > janet >

> > On Nov 19, 2007 11:20 PM, michael lam wrote: > > > > Thank you so much, I am flattered.... > > > > There are only two slight mistakes: 早年以"風中細路"及"大本營"為名自資出版的散文集有一大特色...."風中細路" > > is not my publishing house, but that of a friend's, and the book does have > > an index...... > > > > Sorry this is in English..... > > > > ML > >

> > ________________________________ > > Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 04:08:10 +0800 > > Subject: 我看見的你 (在維基) > > > > > > 邁克， > > > > 你好，我是你的讀者。 > > > > 我是一名producer，經常需要在網上搜集資料。除google 外，wikipedia 也是常到之處。 > > 偶爾發現編輯wikipedia > > 並不難，於是開始為自己感興趣的事和人寫到這個平台上去(予取予求這麼久，算是有私心的回饋) > > > > 雖然已做了不少資料反證，但可能有紕漏之處，為免事後眼冤(如Wyman講過wiki寫錯佢)，我希望親自第一個告訴你我"自把自為"把你寫上去了，如有不正請如實相告，定必馬上改正。 > > > > 網址如下: > > http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%BF%88%E5%85%8B#.E5.87.BA.E7.89.88.E4.BD.9C.E5.93.81.E5.8C.85.E6.8B.AC > > > > 謝謝 > >

I've got evidence,too.

最新留言：14 年前1則留言1個人參與討論

Hi Genui,

The answer is No.

ML

Hi Michael,

I am wondering if I can ask you a private question. That is because I happened to read a web site (http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=迈克_(作家)&variant=zh-tw) about you but I am a little confused...

Did you move to Hong Kong in the childhood?

Genui

At least Janet's email has date and time... And I think it's pretty clear that he did move to HK, though it's not clear when. Moreover, one assumes that if he objects to being labeled as a HK person, he wouldn't have allowed the intro in his books to have labeled him thus. Again, please stop deleting cited content or the citations.—雖不能至 (留言) 2010年5月29日 (六) 14:53 (UTC)回覆

another one

最新留言：14 年前2則留言1個人參與討論

「不是不感到抱歉的。那是八十年代離開三藩市到香港『打天下』的一份臨別禮物，送禮的是一位叫潘泥的影評人」---出自「坦白說，親愛的（Frankly My Dear)」published in 2007。

All we need is a FACT rather than a conjecture.

And this contradicts what was in the article how...? No one is disputing that he's originally from Singapore, just discussing how long one has to live in a place before he/she can claim to belong to that place (or have other people claim it for you). Please do find a reference that calls him a Singaporean writer/etc. instead of just "from Singapore". And please, do sign your comments.—雖不能至 (留言) 2010年5月30日 (日) 09:59 (UTC)回覆

Also, we all don't have rights to call him Hong Kong writer unless he claims it by himswlf, but he hasn't done it, has he? You cannot put him into the category of HK writer just because of the publisher or the place where he used to live for a while. If it made sence, we could call 「西西「 a Taiwanese writer or "Edward Lam林奕華「 a Taiwanese diractor and writer, right? Oh, maybe we now should call Michael a "French writer" due to where he is presently.

Nationality will never change by somthing like those. Although he has contributed a lot to Hong Koing culture, still, we cannot say he is NOT Singaporean writer.

Then please do demonstrate how he has contributed to Singaporean culture, especially when most, if not all, of his published work is first published in HK. Moreover, publishers don't publish intros of the authors without letting the author take a look and usually do change them if the author object to anything -- in fact, a lot of times, the authors write their own intros (or at least they do so in the US). So one can assume that he doesn't mind being labeled a HKer. As to your examples, I see your Sisi and Edward Lam (both of whom still identify as HKer and still publish work in HK) and raise you Jinyong and Ni Kuang, who are both born and raised in the mainland and only moved to HK when they're adults but are called HK writers because they publish mostly in HK and have established their names here in HK first. And again, please do sign your comments.—雖不能至 (留言) 2010年5月30日 (日) 19:47 (UTC)回覆

Finally I realise it

Once one of my friends has told me "If you belive anything on the Internet, you are NOT innocent but a fool." Now I finally realise and understand what he said. Maybe the purpose of inventing the Internet (or an encyclopaedia) is fooling innocent people.

A FOOL