| 案件名
|
引用
|
簡介
|
| 威姆斯訴合眾國案
|
217 U.S. 349 (1910年)
|
cruel and unusual punishment
|
| 瑪斯夸特訴合眾國案
|
219 U.S. 346 (1911年)
|
Advisory opinion doctrine
|
| Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.
|
220 U.S. 107 (1911年)
|
constitutionality of corporate income tax
|
| 美國訴格里莫
|
220 U.S. 506 (1911年)
|
森林儲備的控制
|
| 標準石油公司訴合眾國案
|
221 U.S. 1 (1910年)
|
dissolving interstate monopolies
|
| 道威爾訴合眾國案
|
221 U.S. 325 (1911年)
|
海島案
|
| Gompers v. Buck's Stove and Range Co.
|
221 U.S. 418 (1911年)
|
contempt for violating an injunction against a worker's boycott
|
| 霍克訴合眾國案
|
227 U.S. 308 (1913)
|
upheld the Mann Act, but held that Congress could not regulate prostitution
|
| Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell
|
229 U.S. 1 (1913)
|
extensions of patents by use of licenses, rights of copyright holder regarding 「use」 of copyrighted works
|
| 查爾頓訴凱利案
|
229 U.S. 447 (1913)
|
procedures to approve extradition of criminal suspect to another country
|
| Stratton's Independence, Ltd. v. Howbert
|
231 U.S. 399 (1913)
|
|
| 威克斯訴合眾國案
|
232 U.S. 383 (1914)
|
establishment of the exclusionary rule for illegally obtained evidence
|
| 奧坎波訴合眾國案
|
234 U.S. 91 (1914)
|
海島案
|
| Shreveport Rate Case
|
234 U.S. 342 (1914)
|
Commerce clause, regulation of intrastate railroad rates
|
| Coppage v. Kansas
|
236 U.S. 1 (1915)
|
Economic due process and yellow-dog contracts
|
| 伯迪克訴合眾國案
|
236 U.S. 79 (1915)
|
寬恕的法律效應
|
| Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
|
236 U.S. 230 (1915)
|
free speech and the censorship of motion pictures
|
| 吉恩訴合眾國案
|
238 U.S. 347 (1915)
|
constitutionality of Oklahoma's "grandfather law" used to disenfranchise African-American voters
|
| Hadacheck v. Sebastian
|
239 U.S. 394 (1915)
|
municipal regulation of land use
|
| Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization
|
239 U.S. 441 (1915)
|
denial of due process procedural protections for legislative and rulemaking acts, as opposed to adjudicatory proceedings
|
| Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad
|
240 U.S. 1 (1916)
|
power to tax income under the Sixteenth Amendment
|
| Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co.
|
240 U.S. 103 (1916)
|
power to tax income under the Sixteenth Amendment
|
| Georgia, Florida, & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.
|
241 U.S. 190 (1916)
|
responsibilities of parties under a bill of lading
|
| United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty Kegs of Coca-Cola
|
241 U.S. 265 (1916)
|
case brought against Coca-Cola under the Pure Food and Drug Act
|
| 美國訴奧本海默案
|
242 U.S. 85 (1916)
|
doctrine of res judicata applies to criminal cases
|
| American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co.
|
241 U.S. 257 (1916)
|
scope of federal question jurisdiction in patent law case
|
| 凱密乃提訴合眾國案
|
242 U.S. 470 (1917)
|
Mann Act applies to consensual extramarital sex
|
| 邦廷訴俄勒岡州案
|
243 U.S. 426 (1917)
|
勞工法；十小時工作制
|
| 亞當斯訴坦納案
|
244 U.S. 590 (1917)
|
Substantive due process, state's prohibition of employment agencies was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment
|
| Buchanan v. Warley
|
245 U.S. 60 (1917)
|
constitutionality of local ordinance compelling racial segregation of residential housing
|
| 芝加哥貿易委員會訴合眾國案
|
246 U.S. 231 (1918)
|
Rules of a commodities exchange examined under rule of reason
|
| Hammer v. Dagenhart
|
247 U.S. 251 (1918)
|
Congressional power to regulate child labor under the Commerce Clause
|
| International News Service v. Associated Press
|
248 U.S. 215 (1918)
|
新聞的財產權
|
| 申克訴合眾國案
|
249 U.S. 47 (1919)
|
言論自由，明顯和當前的危險標準，戲院火警
|
| 德布斯訴合眾國案
|
249 U.S. 211 (1919)
|
暴動
|
| 艾布拉姆斯訴合眾國案
|
250 U.S. 616 (1919)
|
validity of criminalizing criticism of the government
|
| 史維基托恩木材公司訴合眾國案
|
251 U.S. 385 (1920年)
|
Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine in a tax evasion case
|
| Eisner v. Macomber
|
252 U.S. 189 (1920年)
|
pro rata stock dividend not taxable income
|
| Missouri v. Holland
|
252 U.S. 416 (1920年)
|
州權
|
| 美國訴惠勒案
|
254 U.S. 281 (1920年)
|
Privileges and Immunities Clause and kidnapping
|
| Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.
|
255 U.S. 180 (1921年)
|
federal question jurisdiction in state corporate law matter
|
| 紐貝里訴合眾國案
|
256 U.S. 232 (1921年)
|
Congress lacks the power to regulate primary elections
|
| Dillon v. Gloss
|
256 U.S. 368 (1921年)
|
憲法修正案程序
|
