后行为主义 (政治学)

后行为主义，也称为新行为主义，是对行为主义方法在政治研究中的主导地位的一种反应。后行为主义思想的关键人物之一是 David Easton，他最初是“行为主义革命”的主要倡导者之一。^[1] 后行为主义之支持者声称，尽管行为主义研究声称价值观之中立，但它偏向于现状和社会保护，而不是社会变革。

主要原则

后行为主义挑战学术研究必须是价值中立的观点^[2]，并认为不应忽视价值。^[3]
后行为主义声称，行为主义对可观察和可测量现象的偏见意味着过于强调容易研究的琐碎问题，而忽视了更重要的主题。^[4]
研究应该与社会更相关^[5]，知识分子可以在社会中发挥积极作用。^[6]

批评

Heinz Eulau 将后行为主义描述为“对1960年代末和1970年代初令人不安和震惊的事件所引发的政治挫折的一种近乎歇斯底里的反应”。^[7]

也可以看看

实证主义

参考资料

^ Chaurasia, Radhey (2003) History of Political Thought, New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, p. 135
^ Sanford Schram, Brian Caterino, (2006) Making political science matter: debating knowledge, research, and method, New York: New York University Press, p. 167
^ Chaurasia, Radhey (2003) History of Political Thought, New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, p. 137
^ Jay M. Shafritz (2004) Dictionary of public policy and administration, Oxford: Westview Press, p. 20
^ Chaurasia, Radhey (2003) History of Political Thought, New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, p. 137
^ Chaurasia, Radhey (2003) History of Political Thought, New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, p. 138
^ Eulau, Heinz (1981). "Foreword: On Revolutions That Never Were." In S. L.. Long (ed.), The Handbook of Political Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

延伸阅读

Easton, David (1959) The New Revolution in Political Science, The American Political Science, 63/4: 1051-1061

[1] Chaurasia, Radhey (2003) History of Political Thought, New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, p. 135

[2] Sanford Schram, Brian Caterino, (2006) Making political science matter: debating knowledge, research, and method, New York: New York University Press, p. 167

[3] Chaurasia, Radhey (2003) History of Political Thought, New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, p. 137

[4] Jay M. Shafritz (2004) Dictionary of public policy and administration, Oxford: Westview Press, p. 20

[5] Chaurasia, Radhey (2003) History of Political Thought, New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, p. 137

[6] Chaurasia, Radhey (2003) History of Political Thought, New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, p. 138

[7] Eulau, Heinz (1981). "Foreword: On Revolutions That Never Were." In S. L.. Long (ed.), The Handbook of Political Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]